|
|
|
IDEAS IN ARCHITECTURE
Copyright, 1998: Christopher K. Egan
Why would an architect care about ideas?
If architecture is about buildings, which are physical, then why would we waste our time with ideas, which are non-physical? A complete answer to this question would involve 5000 years of architectural theory and philosophy. Here, and in the articles and papers linked below, are some fragments of an answer.
In philosophical terms, I do not believe that the ideal and the physical are opposites. Rather, I believe that they are two poles of one existence. I believe that physical phenomena are manifestations of the ideal: they follow laws of mathematics, physics or divine will, and sometimes they give form to human ideals and aspirations of humans. Similarly, without ideas physical phenomena are lifeless things. Ideas and beliefs transform dead matter into objects of delight, fear, and wonder.
In terms of architecture, before we decide how to build, we must decide what to build, and why. As a builder, I understand the technicalities and joys of construction; but the most challenging questions in architecture are not answered through laws of physics or engineering; they are questions of culture and psychology. For me, the essence of architecture is not construction; instead it is the design of spaces for humans. It includes spaces for humans, for their activities, for their treasures, and for their aspirations. Architecture uses the physical world of construction to shape, order, structure, articulate and embody our spaces and our beliefs.
The following papers offer glimpses into these issues.
|
|
___________________________________________________________________________________________ |